English English (Canada) Español (Colombia) Deutsch Español Français English (UK) Italiano Português Русский English (US)

Comments

      1. Claude Funston

        If it's fake, how come it's her living room in the background?

        And for those saying the nose is different, you're mad, it's the same nose, just a different angle.

        Reply
        1. klawicki

          You've been to her living room, have you, Claude? Because otherwise, that may be the single dumbest comment ever communicated in the history of human communication.

          Reply
          1. WO

            She has a personal YouTube she's posted to for years (most of them are now deleted but she still has several up). She posts to social media constantly. We're quite aware of what her house looks like, shmuck.

        1. klawicki

          Mate... are you trying to secure the top spot as the most gullible, worthless fucking idiot on the planet? If so... congratulations! For the first time in your life, you've succeeded at something!

          Reply
  1. Bobofromyellowstone

    This FINALLY hit the mainstream? This pic has been all over the celeb leak deepweb sites for ages. It's funny to think that people will now argue over authenticity for another 6 months before realising it's real.

    Reply
  2. shdv

    Doing a reverse search, you can find results from early 2015 without any mention of Jennette's name; this is just another blonde girl with big boobs being published as a leak.

    Reply
  3. dipstick

    Funny, because the mole they circled in the real pic is on her bicep, and the other one is on her shoulder. Plus, she has lots of other moles on her neck and tits that show up in paparazzi shots but not on the nude pic.

    Reply
    1. Arty

      She has two moles on her shoulder. The bloke circled the high mole in one pic and the low mole in the other pic. .......Yeah, which is pretty boneheaded. And the reason you can't see the other moles is because it's a bad pic. A little blurry and a lot of the moles were blown out by the bright lighting.

      Reply
  4. DoucheMachine

    The other photos that exist from the original fappening show much larger nipples and areola. This is fake.

    Reply
  5. Mmiglak

    Wow you lot are idiots. You must have had trouble comparing shapes in preschool. The mole is in the same spot on the arm and the nose and mouth are the same. The difference is in her position and proximity to the camera. Kind of like how your tiny dick might look bigger as you get closer to the mirror. Read a bloody book, dumbasses.

    Reply
  6. Arty

    Anyone else notice that she has two moles on her shoulder (one high and one low) and the person who made this pic circled two different moles? ..........*face palm*

    Reply
  7. Joshnya

    That's her, after a little editing, reduce the brightness and highlights, and add contrast, the moles appear in exactly the same spot. Whoever circled the moles circled the wrong one. She has three visible moles, two on the upper arm and one on the opposite side of the elbow. Not Joshnya.

    Reply
    1. atotehz

      That is not Lena Paul. Their frames and appearances are too different.

      I think the following things look the same in the 2 pictures:
      -Waist/butt ratio and shape
      -Nose
      -Teeth
      -Upper lip
      -Hair
      -Boob size/shape
      -Body frame and proportions
      .. All look the same
      Unless someone did a convincing photoshop, that is Jennette McCurdy.

      Reply
  8. Jim

    I do not care if it is real or fake. That right there is jack off material. Makes me happy to think it is her and get myself off to it

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Dewd Cancel reply