English English (Canada) Español (Colombia) Deutsch Español Français English (UK) Italiano Português Русский English (US)

Comments

  1. BJW

    She must have sacrificed a virgin to the god that invented Photoshop for this shoot. Wonder what it would look like if we saw the original photos?

    Reply
        1. John

          Umm no, she is not wearing any clothes, therefore she is nude. Arguably, there should be more detail in the description, such as nude or strategically covered, but she is nude.

          Reply
        2. Viewfinder

          Actually, in photography and art, the term 'Nude' generally refers to the model being naked but with nothing being 'on show,' so to speak. It's only internet porn sites that use the term 'non-nude,' where the terms have become mixed. In reality, what these so-called non-nude sites were doing were actually nude shoots, just not 'naked' or 'porn' shoots. So, a naked shoot would show some parts, while in a nude shoot, they usually cover what you'd call the interesting parts.

          Reply
  2. Learn how to run a website

    You mean 'nude covered' not nude. You lot clearly have no fucking clue what the word "nude" means. Idiots.

    Reply
    1. Make your own website instead of bitching

      Nudity refers to the amount of clothing she is wearing, not the visibility of her nudity. There could be a giant blackboard placed in front of her, and you wouldn't see a thing, but she would still be nude.

      Reply
  3. Dennis

    There have been some photo editors hard at work with this shoot, used to love her, in her younger days, now I don't know why she does it, only the mentally retarded will think these aren't photoshopped like crazy.

    Reply
  4. Henry

    A petite woman, who trains 3 - 5 days a week, can look like this at 48. So, settle down about the Photoshop — you've probably never been with an older woman who looks after herself.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to BBunsen Cancel reply